Marie Lucie Jean, Lucien Louis, Miami Daily News, Intervenors-Appellants v. Alan C. Nelson, Cross-Appellees

683 F.2d 1311, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 17514
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided July 13, 1982·No. 82-5772·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

The United States has moved for a partial stay of the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida entered June 29, 1982. Hearing and briefing have been expedited, and the Court has heard oral argument and has considered the briefs.

To justify granting the partial stay the United States would be required to show that the following circumstances exist: (1) likelihood of ultimate success on appeal; (2) irreparable injury to the government; (3) granting the stay will not substantially harm plaintiffs; and (4) the public interest will be served by the partial stay.

The government has not been able to show that any one or more of these circumstances exist.

The motion for partial stay is DENIED.

The case is expedited for hearing on an eariy orai argument calendar,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marie Lucie Jean, Lucien Louis, Miami Daily News, Intervenors-Appellants v. Alan C. Nelson, Cross-Appellees, 683 F.2d 1311, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 17514 (11th Cir. 1982).

683 F.2d 1311 (Marie Lucie Jean, Lucien Louis, Miami Daily News, Intervenors-Appellants v. Alan C. Nelson, Cross-Appellees) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Garcia v. Stillman
S.D. Florida, 2023
Garcia-Mir v. Meese
781 F.2d 1450 (Eleventh Circuit, 1986)
Louis v. Nelson
624 F. Supp. 836 (S.D. Florida, 1985)
Paulis v. Sava
544 F. Supp. 819 (S.D. New York, 1982)