Marie-Louise Pauson v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 18 2017 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARIE-LOUISE PAUSON, No. 16-35800

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:15-cv-05612-RBL

v. MEMORANDUM* BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Ronald B. Leighton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 11, 2017**

Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

Marie-Louise Pauson appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing her action alleging a violation of the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”).

We review de novo questions of our own jurisdiction. Hunt v. Imperial Merchant

Servs., Inc., 560 F.3d 1137, 1140 (9th Cir. 2009).

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Because the foreclosure sale of the property has already been completed, we

cannot grant the relief Pauson requests and we dismiss the appeal as moot. See

Vegas Diamond Props., LLC v. FDIC, 669 F.3d 933, 936 (9th Cir. 2012) (“[T]he

sale of the real properties prevents this Court from granting the requested relief and

accordingly renders this appeal moot.”); Am. Cas. Co. of Reading, Pa. v. Baker, 22

F.3d 880, 896 (9th Cir. 1994) (a case is moot when there is no longer a present

controversy as to which effective relief can be granted).

DISMISSED.

2 16-35800