Marie Fleurima v. Ivonne Harting
This text of Marie Fleurima v. Ivonne Harting (Marie Fleurima v. Ivonne Harting) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
MARIE FLEURIMA, Appellant,
v.
IVONNE HARTING, Appellee.
No. 4D2025-2419
[April 29, 2026]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael A. Robinson, Judge; L.T. Case No. 062022CA010386AXXXCE.
Marie Fleurima, Sunrise, pro se.
No appearance for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Edman v. Edman, 407 So. 3d 452, 454–55 (Fla. 4th DCA 2025) (because no trial transcript was provided to the appellate court and the provided statement of the evidence was not approved by the trial court as required by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(b)(5), “our review is limited to those errors that may appear on the face of the final judgment”).
KUNTZ, C.J., MAY and FORST, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Marie Fleurima v. Ivonne Harting, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marie-fleurima-v-ivonne-harting-fladistctapp-2026.