Marie Carney Hossfeld v. Brian Dean Sunshine
This text of Marie Carney Hossfeld v. Brian Dean Sunshine (Marie Carney Hossfeld v. Brian Dean Sunshine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-10-00476-CV
Marie Carney Hossfeld, Appellant
v.
Brian Dean Sunshine, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 146TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. 189,783-D, HONORABLE RICK MORRIS, JUDGE PRESIDING
O R D E R
PER CURIAM
Appellant, representing herself pro se, has filed a second motion for extension of time to file her brief. She was initially granted one ninety-day extension, and now seeks to have the deadline extended to April 21, 2011. She explains that she is attempting to prepare her brief and is also in discussions with an attorney who may agree to represent her. Appellee, also proceeding pro se, has filed a response objecting to the motion. We hereby grant the motion for extension of time, making the brief due April 21, 2011. We caution appellant that no further extensions will be granted and her failure to file a brief in compliance with the rules of appellate procedure, see Tex. R. App. P. 38.1, will result in the immediate dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution. See id. R. 42.3.
Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Rose
Filed: March 11, 2011
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Marie Carney Hossfeld v. Brian Dean Sunshine, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marie-carney-hossfeld-v-brian-dean-sunshine-texapp-2011.