Marie Anderson v. H & R Block

Eleventh Circuit

Marie Anderson v. H & R Block

344 F.3d 1131, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 18190, 2003 WL 22048203

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedSeptember 3, 2003

Docket01-11863

StatusPublished

This text of 344 F.3d 1131 (Marie Anderson v. H & R Block) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marie Anderson v. H & R Block, 344 F.3d 1131, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 18190, 2003 WL 22048203 (11th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

On June 2, 2003, the United States Supreme Court reversed our decision in this matter, holding that “an action filed in a state court to recover damages from a national bank for allegedly charging excessive interest in violation of both ‘the common law usury doctrine’ and an Alabama usury statute may be removed to a federal court because it actually arises under federal law.” Beneficial Nat'l Bank v. Anderson, — U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 2058, 156 L.Ed.2d 1 (2003). In light of the Supreme Court’s holding, we AFFIRM and REMAND this case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

On June 2, 2003, the United States Supreme Court reversed our decision in this matter, holding that “an action filed in a state court to recover damages from a national bank for allegedly charging excessive interest in violation of both ‘the common law usury doctrine’ and an Alabama usury statute may be removed to a federal court because it actually arises under federal law.” Beneficial Nat'l Bank v. Anderson, — U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 2058, 156 L.Ed.2d 1 (2003). In light of the Supreme Court’s holding, we AFFIRM and REMAND this case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

344 F.3d 1131, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 18190, 2003 WL 22048203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marie-anderson-v-h-r-block-ca11-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack