Mariconda v. Petruser

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mariconda v. Petruser

369 So. 2d 105, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14769

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 3, 1979

DocketNo. 78-1336

StatusPublished

This text of 369 So. 2d 105 (Mariconda v. Petruser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mariconda v. Petruser, 369 So. 2d 105, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14769 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Two points are presented on this appeal, one being procedural and the other going to the substantive basis for the final judgment entered. The procedural point does not present reversible error under the principles stated in Marsh v. Sarasota County, 97 So.2d 312 (Fla. 2d DCA 1957). Having passed the procedural question, an examination of the record reveals that the judgment is adequately supported by the evidence presented.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Two points are presented on this appeal, one being procedural and the other going to the substantive basis for the final judgment entered. The procedural point does not present reversible error under the principles stated in Marsh v. Sarasota County, 97 So.2d 312 (Fla. 2d DCA 1957). Having passed the procedural question, an examination of the record reveals that the judgment is adequately supported by the evidence presented.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

369 So. 2d 105, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mariconda-v-petruser-fladistctapp-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack