Maricle v. FARMSTEAD FOODS/SELF-INSURED

739 N.W.2d 160, 2007 Minn. LEXIS 615, 2007 WL 2874950
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided September 26, 2007·No. A07-1267·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed June 14, 2007, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/Sam Hanson Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maricle v. FARMSTEAD FOODS/SELF-INSURED, 739 N.W.2d 160, 2007 Minn. LEXIS 615, 2007 WL 2874950 (Mich. 2007).

739 N.W.2d 160 (Maricle v. FARMSTEAD FOODS/SELF-INSURED) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hoff v. Kempton
317 N.W.2d 361 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)