Maricela Duarte-Gutierrez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
This text of 487 F. App'x 383 (Maricela Duarte-Gutierrez v. Eric Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Maricela Duarte-Gutierrez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her motion to reopen deportation proceedings conducted in absentia. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Arrieta v. INS, 117 F.3d 429, 430 (9th Cir.1997) (per curiam), and we grant the petition for review and remand.
The agency abused its discretion in denying Duarte-Gutierrez’s motion to reopen on the ground that he failed to establish lack of notice. The record contains a returned certified mail receipt with the United States Postal Service notation “NSN RB 1” and the BIA erred in failing to take administrative notice of the fact that “NSN” stands for “no such number.” 8 C.F.R. § 1003. l(d)(3)(iv)(the BIA may take administrative notice of commonly known facts). Accordingly, we grant the petition and remand for further proceedings. INS v. Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 16-17, 123 S.Ct. 353, 154 L.Ed.2d 272 (2002) (per curiam).
In light of our disposition, we need not reach Duarte-Gutierrez’s remaining contentions.
We deny the government’s motion to strike.
PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
487 F. App'x 383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maricela-duarte-gutierrez-v-eric-holder-jr-ca9-2012.