Mariau A. Mignogna v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, a Corp.

Third Circuit

Mariau A. Mignogna v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, a Corp.

339 F.2d 263

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided December 22, 1964·No. 14900·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this Federal Employers’ Liability Act case, on the question of whether plaintiff’s injuries were the result of the accident involved, the trial judge was properly within the record in holding that the causation from said accident for plaintiff’s injuries “ * * * was sufficiently inferrable from the evidence, particularly from the testimony of Dr. Hen-ninger; * * * ”. The Other issue before us concerns remarks by counsel for the plaintiff during his summation. From our own study of the transcript, we are satisfied that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying a new trial on this ground.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this Federal Employers’ Liability Act case, on the question of whether plaintiff’s injuries were the result of the accident involved, the trial judge was properly within the record in holding that the causation from said accident for plaintiff’s injuries “ * * * was sufficiently inferrable from the evidence, particularly from the testimony of Dr. Hen-ninger; * * * ”. The Other issue before us concerns remarks by counsel for the plaintiff during his summation. From our own study of the transcript, we are satisfied that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying a new trial on this ground.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Mariau A. Mignogna v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, a Corp., 339 F.2d 263 (3d Cir. 1964).

Pincite

339 F.2d 263 (Mariau A. Mignogna v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, a Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.