Mariana Huerta-Saucedo v. City Bronx Leasing Inc.

2017 NY Slip Op 1505, 147 A.D.3d 695, 48 N.Y.S.3d 132
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 28, 2017
Docket3239
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 1505 (Mariana Huerta-Saucedo v. City Bronx Leasing Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mariana Huerta-Saucedo v. City Bronx Leasing Inc., 2017 NY Slip Op 1505, 147 A.D.3d 695, 48 N.Y.S.3d 132 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lizbeth Gonzalez, J.), entered December 7, 2015, which, to the extent appealable, granted plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability, unanimously modified, on the law, to deny the motion to the extent it sought partial summary judgment as to defendants’ liability, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs met their prima facie burden of establishing both their own lack of culpability and the fault of both driver defendants. They submitted affidavits averring that they were backseat passengers in a cab driven by defendant Gonzalez, which was hit by a vehicle driven by defendant Yasmine Garcia, when both vehicles entered an intersection with a red light against them. In opposition, City Bronx and Gonzalez did not dispute that plaintiffs were innocent passengers in their vehicle, but Gonzalez averred that he was proceeding lawfully through the intersection, with a green light in his favor, when the second car made a sudden left turn and hit him. Codefend-ants submitted the affidavit of Yasmine Garcia, who averred that she was making a lawful left turn, with a green arrow light in her favor, when she was struck by the other vehicle. These conflicting versions as to how the accident occurred raise triable issues of fact that preclude summary judgment on the issue of defendants’ liability (see Oluwatayo v Dulinayan, 142 AD3d 113, 119-120 [1st Dept 2016]). Accordingly, plaintiffs were entitled only to an order finding that their absence of liability was established (id.; CPLR 3212 [g]).

Concur — Renwick, J.P., Mazzarelli, Moskowitz, Kapnick and Webber, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martinez v. Martinez
2025 NY Slip Op 05889 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
Wachtel v. Alan Joel Communications, Inc.
2025 NY Slip Op 05053 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
Colon v. Woolco Foods Inc.
2019 NY Slip Op 8364 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Castro v. Hatim
2019 NY Slip Op 5639 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Bajaha v. Mercy Care Transp., Inc.
2019 NY Slip Op 3457 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Jarrett v. Claro
2018 NY Slip Op 3760 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 NY Slip Op 1505, 147 A.D.3d 695, 48 N.Y.S.3d 132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mariana-huerta-saucedo-v-city-bronx-leasing-inc-nyappdiv-2017.