Marian Fraser v. the State of Texas
This text of Marian Fraser v. the State of Texas (Marian Fraser v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-23-00131-CR
MARIAN FRASER, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 19th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2014-158-C1, Honorable David Hodges, Presiding
September 13, 2023 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before PARKER and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ.
Appellant, Marian Fraser, appeals his conviction for murder1 and sentence to fifty
years’ confinement.2 Appellant’s appointed counsel now moves to withdraw from the
appeal because he “has withdrawn from the appellate appointment list and has been
1 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 19.02.
2 Originally appealed to the Tenth Court of Appeals, this appeal was transferred to this Court by the
Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001. assigned by his firm to focus primarily on family law and criminal trial cases, rather than
criminal appeals.”
Because the trial court is responsible for appointing counsel to represent indigent
defendants in criminal cases, as well as relieving or replacing appointed counsel, we
abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court to rule on Appellant’s motion to
withdraw. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. arts. 1.051(d), 26.04(j)(2). Upon remand, the
trial court shall determine (1) whether Appellant still desires to prosecute the appeal; (2)
whether to grant Appellant’s counsel’s motion to withdraw; and (3) if the motion to
withdraw is granted, whether Appellant is indigent and entitled to appointment of new
counsel.
If the trial court grants the motion to withdraw and appoints Appellant new counsel;
the name, address, email address, phone number, and State Bar number of any newly
appointed counsel shall be included in the court’s findings. The trial court may also enter
such orders necessary to address the aforementioned questions. The trial court’s
findings and any orders issued shall be included in a supplemental clerk’s record to be
filed with this Court by October 13, 2023.
All appellate deadlines, including Appellant’s pending briefing deadline, are
suspended until further order of this Court.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Marian Fraser v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marian-fraser-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.