MARIA VICTORIA CASTRO v. LUZ MARINA CASTRO

• Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
• Decided: November 30, 2022
• Docket: 21-2236
• Status: Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed November 30, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

Nos. 3D21-2235 & 3D21-2236 Lower Tribunal Nos. 19-1719, 19-2235 ________________

Maria Victoria Castro, Appellant,

vs.

Luz Marina Castro, Appellee.

Appeals from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jorge E. Cueto, Judge.

Ellis Law Group, P.L., and Jordan R. Hammer (Boca Raton), for appellant.

Golden Glasko & Associates, P.A., and William H. Glasko, for appellee.

Before EMAS, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Scott v. Harris, 550 U.S. 372, 380 (2007) (“When opposing

parties tell two different stories, one of which is blatantly contradicted by the

record, so that no reasonable jury could believe it, a court should not adopt

that version of the facts for purposes of ruling on a motion for summary

judgment.”) see also Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 247–48

(1986) (“[T]he mere existence of some alleged factual dispute between the

parties will not defeat an otherwise properly supported motion for summary

judgment; the requirement is that there be no genuine issue of material

fact.”).