Maria v. White
This text of 3 D.C. 663 (Maria v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
But the Court refused to give the said instruction. And Cranch, C. J., suggested a doubt, whether a slave gained his freedom, under the third section of the act, by being sold within three years after being imported, if he was not originally imported for sale, or to reside.
The cases cited in argument were, Baptiste et al. v. De Volunbrun, 5 Har. & Johns. 86; Defontaine v. Defontaine, in a note to the former case, 5 Har. & Johns. 86; Henry v. Ball, 1 Wheat. 5; Gardner v. Simpson, in this Court, at April term, 1823, not reported; Negro William Jordan v. Sawyer, in this Court, at the same term, (2 Cranch, C. C. 373); Stewart v. Nokes, 5 Har. & Johns. 107.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 D.C. 663, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maria-v-white-circtddc-1829.