Maria Torres v. Arthur Udell Strickland
This text of Maria Torres v. Arthur Udell Strickland (Maria Torres v. Arthur Udell Strickland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MARIA TORRES, APPELLANT,
ARTHUR UDELL STRICKLAND, APPELLEE.
Appellant, Maria Torres, appealed a final judgment entered on December 9, 2005. On November 20, 2007, this Court abated the appeal because of the court reporter's failure to file the record with the Court on or before January 19, 2007. Following the abatement, the trial court issued findings of fact indicating that the reporter's record was timely requested by the appellant; that the record was lost or destroyed, cannot be replaced, and is necessary to the appeal in this case; and that the appellant was not at fault for such loss. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.6 (f).
Accordingly, on September 10, 2008, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that based on a review of the findings of fact issued by the trial court, the appeal would be dismissed, unless a motion was filed within ten days from the date of receipt of the notice. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a),(c). On September 16, 2008, appellant's counsel contacted the Clerk of the Court indicating that a motion for new trial had been filed in the trial court. An order for new trial was granted by the trial court on October 1, 2008.
Accordingly, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered
and filed this the 30th day of October, 2008.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Maria Torres v. Arthur Udell Strickland, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maria-torres-v-arthur-udell-strickland-texapp-2008.