Maria Solange Ferrarini v. Ipek Irgit

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided December 18, 2019·No. 1:19-cv-00096·Unknown

Opinion

USDC SDNY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELECTRONICALLY FILED mannan nanan nnn nnn X DOC #: : DATE FILED: 12/18/2019 MARIA SOLANGE FERRARINI, : Plaintiff, : : 19 Civ. 96 (LGS) -against- : : ORDER IPEK IRGIT, et al., : Defendants. : wane ee KX LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge: It is hereby ORDERED that, by December 23, 2019, the parties shall each file letters on ECF, not to exceed five pages, providing the legal arguments as to why the at-issue bikini is afforded protection by the Copyright Act, and is not a “useful article” that is not afforded such protection. See, e.g., Jovani Fashion, Ltd. v. Fiesta Fashions, 500 F. App'x 42 (2d Cir. 2012). Dated: December 18, 2019 New York, New York

LORNA G. Sciornb UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maria Solange Ferrarini v. Ipek Irgit, (S.D.N.Y. 2019).

Maria Solange Ferrarini v. Ipek Irgit (Maria Solange Ferrarini v. Ipek Irgit) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jovani Fashion, Ltd. v. Fiesta Fashions
500 F. App'x 42 (Second Circuit, 2012)