Maria Rivera v. Mary Ann Novosad

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 16, 2005
Docket10-03-00084-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Maria Rivera v. Mary Ann Novosad (Maria Rivera v. Mary Ann Novosad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maria Rivera v. Mary Ann Novosad, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS


No. 10-03-00084-CV

Maria Rivera,

                                                                      Appellant

 v.

Mary Ann Novosad,

                                                                      Appellee


From the 12th District Court

Madison County, Texas

Trial Court # 01-9666-012-01

MEMORANDUM Opinion


          Appellant Maria Rivera has filed a motion to dismiss her appeal stating the appeal has now been resolved and the settlement reached is final. 

          This appeal is dismissed.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).  Costs are taxed against Appellant.  Id. (d).

                                                                   TOM GRAY

                                                                   Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

          Justice Vance, and

          Justice Reyna

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed March 16, 2005

[CV06]

. 27.1(b). According to Rule 27.1(b), a premature notice of appeal takes effect in a criminal case “on the same day, but after, . . . the appealable order is signed by the trial court.” Id. We are willing to wait a reasonable time for the trial court to sign an order adjudicating the merits of McIntosh’s motion for DNA testing. See Cravin v. State, No. 01-01-1166-CR, 2002 Tex. App. LEXIS 8494, at *3 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Nov. 27, 2002, no pet. h.) (written order required for post-conviction DNA appeal). But, if a supplemental record containing such an order is not filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before 5:00 p.m. on December 27, 2002, we will dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Cook v. Lernout & Hauspie Med. Servs. Div., 68 S.W.3d 285, 286 (Tex. App.—Waco, order), disp. on merits, 76 S.W.3d 203 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, no pet.).


                                                                   PER CURIAM


Before Chief Justice Davis,

      Justice Gray

      (Justice Gray dissenting)

Order issued and filed December 11, 2002

Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cravin v. State
95 S.W.3d 506 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2002)
Cook v. Lernout & Hauspie Medical Services Division
68 S.W.3d 285 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Maria Rivera v. Mary Ann Novosad, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maria-rivera-v-mary-ann-novosad-texapp-2005.