MARIA R. SERGENT CHAUSER v. ADAM SHAI CHAUSER
This text of MARIA R. SERGENT CHAUSER v. ADAM SHAI CHAUSER (MARIA R. SERGENT CHAUSER v. ADAM SHAI CHAUSER) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed May 12, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D20-1363 Lower Tribunal No. 19-23233 ________________
Maria R. Sergent Chauser, Appellant,
vs.
Adam Shai Chauser, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Marcia Del Rey, Judge.
Maria R. Sergent Chauser, in proper person.
Kaplan Loebl, LLC, and Liliana Loebl and Amanda B. Haberman, for appellee.
Before SCALES, HENDON and MILLER, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150,
1152 (Fla. 1979) (“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude
that the trial court’s judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an
alternative theory.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
MARIA R. SERGENT CHAUSER v. ADAM SHAI CHAUSER, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maria-r-sergent-chauser-v-adam-shai-chauser-fladistctapp-2021.