MARIA R. SERGENT CHAUSER v. ADAM SHAI CHAUSER

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 12, 2021·No. 20-1363·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed May 12, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

No. 3D20-1363

Lower Tribunal No. 19-23233

Maria R. Sergent Chauser, Appellant,

vs.

Adam Shai Chauser,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Marcia Del Rey, Judge.

Maria R. Sergent Chauser, in proper person.

Kaplan Loebl, LLC, and Liliana Loebl and Amanda B. Haberman, for appellee.

Before SCALES, HENDON and MILLER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate

court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court’s judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MARIA R. SERGENT CHAUSER v. ADAM SHAI CHAUSER, (Fla. Ct. App. 2021).

MARIA R. SERGENT CHAUSER v. ADAM SHAI CHAUSER (MARIA R. SERGENT CHAUSER v. ADAM SHAI CHAUSER) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
377 So. 2d 1150 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)