Maria Navarro Martin v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 10, 2026·No. 6D2024-2218·Published

Opinion

SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Case No. 6D2024-2218

Lower Tribunal No. 2017-CF-010498-A-O

MARIA NAVARRO MARTIN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County.

Chad K. Alvaro, Judge.

July 10, 2026

WOZNIAK, J.

Maria Navarro Martin seeks to appeal several orders; however, her appeal is timely as to only one of them—the trial court’s order barring all future pro se filings. We find no merit in the arguments Martin raises on appeal directed to that order. See State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47, 48-49 (Fla. 1999) (recognizing that issuance of order to show cause satisfies litigant’s due process rights of notice and opportunity to respond). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal insofar as it is untimely, and we affirm the trial court’s order barring future pro se filings.

AFFIRMED in part; DISMISSED in part.

GANNAM and PRATT, JJ., concur.

Maria Navarro Martin, Pompano Beach, pro se.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Whitney Brown Hartless, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maria Navarro Martin v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2026).

Maria Navarro Martin v. State of Florida (Maria Navarro Martin v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Spencer
751 So. 2d 47 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)