Maria Mendoza v. Eric Holder, Jr.
This text of 424 F. App'x 652 (Maria Mendoza v. Eric Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Maria Lourdes Mendoza and Raphaella Mendoza, natives and citizens of the Philippines, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s finding of fact, and review de novo questions of law. Vasquez v. Holder, 602 F.3d 1003, 1009 (9th Cir.2010). We deny the petition for review.
Substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that Maria Lourdes Mendoza willfully misrepresented a material fact in order to obtain permanent residence based on marriage to a United States citizen, and is therefore removable under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(1)(A); Forbes v. INS, 48 F.3d 439, 441-42 (9th Cir.1995).
Petitioners’ contention that the agency ignored the evidence in Maria Lourdes Mendoza’s application for cancellation of removal as a battered spouse under 8 *653 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(2) is not supported by the record.
Petitioners’ remaining contention is unavailing.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
424 F. App'x 652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maria-mendoza-v-eric-holder-jr-ca9-2011.