Maria Marquez Guevara v. Loretta Lynch

669 F. App'x 92
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 22, 2016
Docket15-2488
StatusUnpublished

This text of 669 F. App'x 92 (Maria Marquez Guevara v. Loretta Lynch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maria Marquez Guevara v. Loretta Lynch, 669 F. App'x 92 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Maria Delmis Marquez Guevara, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing her appeal from the Immigration Judge’s denial of her requests for asylum and withholding of removal. *

Marquez Guevara challenges the finding that her asylum application is time-barred and that no exceptions were applicable. See 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(2)(B) (2012); 8 C.F.R. § 1208.4(a)(2) (2016). We lack jurisdiction to review this determination pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(3) (2012), and find that Marquez Guevara has not raised any claims that would fall under the exception set forth in 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D) (2012). See Gomis v. Holder, 571 F.3d 353, 358-59 (4th Cir. 2009). Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for review with respect to the asylum claim.

To the extent Marquez Guevara challenges the Board’s finding that she failed to establish eligibility for withholding of removal, we conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the agency’s factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision, INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review in part for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re Marquez Guevara (B.I.A. Oct. 28, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DISMISSED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART

*

Marquez Guevara does not raise any claims regarding the denial of protection under the Convention Against Torture.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gomis v. Holder
571 F.3d 353 (Fourth Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
669 F. App'x 92, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maria-marquez-guevara-v-loretta-lynch-ca4-2016.