Maria Luevano v. Eric Holder, Jr.
This text of 580 F. App'x 614 (Maria Luevano v. Eric Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Maria Luevano, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales, 458 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir.2006). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.
Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because Luevano failed to establish that it is more likely than not she will be tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of a government official if she returns to Mexico. See id. at 1188.
We lack jurisdiction to consider Lueva-no’s contentions regarding changed circumstances, asylum, and her conviction, because she did not raise them to the BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004) (court lacks jurisdiction to consider issues that have not been administratively exhausted).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
580 F. App'x 614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maria-luevano-v-eric-holder-jr-ca9-2014.