Maria Guadalupe Espitia and Tomasa Prado Zapata v. Blanca Isidora Davila and Arturo Davila

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: December 27, 2012
• Docket: 13-12-00017-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-12-00017-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

MARIA GUADALUPE ESPITIA AND TOMASA PRADO ZAPATA, Appellants,

v.

BLANCA ISIDORA DAVILA AND ARTURO DAVILA, Appellees. ____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 of Hidalgo County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, Maria Guadalupe Espitia and Tomasa Prado Zapata, perfected an

appeal from a judgment entered by the County Court at Law No. 5 of Hidalgo County,

Texas, in cause number CL-11-1288-E. The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that all matters in controversy between them in this cause have

been settled. The parties request that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motion to

dismiss, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a).

The joint motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. In

accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring

same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax

costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at the parties’ request, no

motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 27th day of December, 2012.