Maria Gonzalez Fernandez v. Dolphins Cycling Challenge, Inc., Etc.

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 17, 2025
Docket3D2024-1801
StatusPublished

This text of Maria Gonzalez Fernandez v. Dolphins Cycling Challenge, Inc., Etc. (Maria Gonzalez Fernandez v. Dolphins Cycling Challenge, Inc., Etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maria Gonzalez Fernandez v. Dolphins Cycling Challenge, Inc., Etc., (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed September 17, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D24-1801 Lower Tribunal No. 23-22834-CA-01 ________________

Maria Gonzalez Fernandez, Appellant,

vs.

Dolphins Cycling Challenge, Inc., etc., et al., Appellees.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Joseph Perkins, Judge.

Gerson & Schwartz, P.A., and Edward S. Schwartz and Philip M. Gerson, for appellant.

Kennedys CMK LLP, and Jedidiah Vander Klok, Alexander J. Fumagali, Sneh I. Patel, and Audrey Franklin, for appellees.

Before SCALES, C.J., and LINDSEY and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Rich v. Narog, 366 So. 3d 1111, 1118 (Fla. 3d DCA

2022) (explaining that, where the nonmoving party bears the burden of proof

on a dispositive issue at trial, the moving party need only demonstrate an

absence of evidence to support the nonmoving party’s case. Once the

moving party satisfies this burden, “it is incumbent upon the nonmoving party

to come forward with evidentiary material demonstrating that a genuine issue

of fact exists as to an element necessary for the non-movant to prevail at

trial”); Ibarra v. Ross Dress for Less, Inc., 350 So. 3d 465, 467 (Fla. 3d DCA

2022) (citing Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.510(a) and holding that

summary judgment will be granted where the “movant shows that there is no

genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment

as a matter of law”); Massage Envy Franchising, LLC v. Doe, 339 So. 3d

481, 484 (Fla. 5th DCA 2022) (“[A] clickwrap agreement occurs when a

website directs a purchaser or user to the terms and conditions of the sale

and requires the user to click a box to acknowledge that they have read those

terms and conditions. These agreements are generally enforceable.”)

(citation omitted); see generally Miami Dolphins, Ltd. v. Engwiller, 410 So.

3d 685 (Fla. 3d DCA 2025).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Maria Gonzalez Fernandez v. Dolphins Cycling Challenge, Inc., Etc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maria-gonzalez-fernandez-v-dolphins-cycling-challenge-inc-etc-fladistctapp-2025.