Maria Fernandez, Jose Manuel Ibarra and Robert Joseph Kunst v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 8, 2011
Docket03-10-00022-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Maria Fernandez, Jose Manuel Ibarra and Robert Joseph Kunst v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services (Maria Fernandez, Jose Manuel Ibarra and Robert Joseph Kunst v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maria Fernandez, Jose Manuel Ibarra and Robert Joseph Kunst v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-10-00021-CV

Maria Fernandez, Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY, 340TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. C-08–263-CPS, HONORABLE JAY K. WEATHERBY, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Maria Fernandez filed this accelerated appeal from the district court’s final

order terminating her parental rights to her minor child, M.A.F. Appellant’s court-appointed attorney

filed a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the

requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) by presenting a professional evaluation

of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced on appeal. See

also Taylor v. Texas Dep’t of Protective & Regulatory Servs., 160 S.W.3d 641, 646-47 (Tex.

App.—Austin 2005, pet. denied) (applying Anders procedure in appeal from termination of parental

rights). Counsel has certified to this Court that she provided appellant a copy of the Anders brief and

a notice of her right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has

been filed. We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and have found nothing that would

arguably support an appeal. We agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. Finding

nothing in the record that might arguably support an appeal, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw

and affirm the order of termination.

_____________________________________________

J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Henson and Goodwin

Affirmed

Filed: July 8, 2011

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Taylor v. Texas Department of Protective & Regulatory Services
160 S.W.3d 641 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Maria Fernandez, Jose Manuel Ibarra and Robert Joseph Kunst v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maria-fernandez-jose-manuel-ibarra-and-robert-joseph-kunst-v-texas-texapp-2011.