Maria Elide Moreno and Alfredo Moreno v. Melissa Rosales

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 20, 2012·No. 13-10-00486-CV·Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-12-00391-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

IN RE ARLISS L. LINDER JR.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justices Valdez and Justices Garza and Vela Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam1 Relator, Arliss L. Linder, Jr., a pro se litigant currently incarcerated in the George

Beto Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Institutional Division (“TDCJ-ID”),

has filed a petition for writ of mandamus in which he contends that prison staff denied

his access to supplies necessary for mailing his brief in a pending appeal. Relator asks

that we issue a writ of mandamus compelling the director of TDCJ-ID to order the

warden of the Beto Unit to grant him access to the supplies.

1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions), 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.”). Having reviewed and fully considered relator’s petition, we conclude that he has

not shown himself entitled to the relief sought because we lack mandamus jurisdiction

over the TDCJ-ID director. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(b) (West 2004) (limiting

our mandamus jurisdiction to district and county judges). Accordingly, the petition for

writ of mandamus is DENIED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 20th day of June, 2012.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maria Elide Moreno and Alfredo Moreno v. Melissa Rosales, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Maria Elide Moreno and Alfredo Moreno v. Melissa Rosales (Maria Elide Moreno and Alfredo Moreno v. Melissa Rosales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.