Maria E. Perales and Edward L. Perales v. Spohn Health System Corp.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 21, 2003
Docket13-02-00078-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Maria E. Perales and Edward L. Perales v. Spohn Health System Corp. (Maria E. Perales and Edward L. Perales v. Spohn Health System Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maria E. Perales and Edward L. Perales v. Spohn Health System Corp., (Tex. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

                                   NUMBER 13-02-078-CV

                             COURT OF APPEALS

                   THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                      CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

________________________________________________________________

MARIA E. PERALES AND EDWARD L. PERALES,            Appellants,

                                                   v.

SPOHN HEALTH SYSTEM CORP., ET AL.,                               Appellees.

_______________________________________________________________

                         On appeal from the 94th District Court

                                  of Nueces County, Texas.

________________________________________________________________

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION

         Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa and Rodriguez

Opinion Per Curiam


Appellants, MARIA E. PERALES AND EDWARD L. PERALES, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 94th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 97-5259-C.  After the record and briefs were filed and after the cause was set for submission and oral argument, appellants filed a motion to dismiss the appeal.  In the motion, appellants state that the parties have reached an agreement with respect to the issues presented in the appeal.  Appellants request that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants= motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.  Appellants= motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 21st day of January, 2003.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Maria E. Perales and Edward L. Perales v. Spohn Health System Corp., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maria-e-perales-and-edward-l-perales-v-spohn-healt-texapp-2003.