Maria E. Espinoza Gilbert Espinoza Mary Ellen Cale, Guardian Ad Litem v. Brian Dunn Geody Okamoto Patrick Martin Dan Smith
38 F.3d 462, 94 Daily Journal DAR 14777, 40 Fed. R. Serv. 985, 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7982, 39 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 477, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 29146
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 20, 1994·No. 92-56018·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
38 F.3d 462w
30 Fed.R.Serv.3d 477, 40 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 985
Maria E. ESPINOZA; Gilbert Espinoza; Mary Ellen Cale,
guardian ad litem, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Brian DUNN; Geody Okamoto; Patrick Martin; Dan Smith,
Defendants-Appellants.
Nos. 91-56353, 91-56389 and 92-56018.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Dec. 7, 1993.
Decided Oct. 20, 1994.
NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION. SEE 38 f.3d 466.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Maria E. Espinoza Gilbert Espinoza Mary Ellen Cale, Guardian Ad Litem v. Brian Dunn Geody Okamoto Patrick Martin Dan Smith, 38 F.3d 462, 94 Daily Journal DAR 14777, 40 Fed. R. Serv. 985, 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7982, 39 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 477, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 29146 (9th Cir. 1994).
38 F.3d 462 (Maria E. Espinoza Gilbert Espinoza Mary Ellen Cale, Guardian Ad Litem v. Brian Dunn Geody Okamoto Patrick Martin Dan Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Espinoza v. Dunn
38 F.3d 462 (Ninth Circuit, 1995)