Maria E. Espinoza Gilbert Espinoza Mary Ellen Cale, Guardian Ad Litem v. Brian Dunn Geody Okamoto Patrick Martin Dan Smith

Ninth Circuit

Maria E. Espinoza Gilbert Espinoza Mary Ellen Cale, Guardian Ad Litem v. Brian Dunn Geody Okamoto Patrick Martin Dan Smith

38 F.3d 462, 94 Daily Journal DAR 14777, 40 Fed. R. Serv. 985, 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7982, 39 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 477, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 29146

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedOctober 20, 1994

Docket92-56018

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 38 F.3d 462 (Maria E. Espinoza Gilbert Espinoza Mary Ellen Cale, Guardian Ad Litem v. Brian Dunn Geody Okamoto Patrick Martin Dan Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maria E. Espinoza Gilbert Espinoza Mary Ellen Cale, Guardian Ad Litem v. Brian Dunn Geody Okamoto Patrick Martin Dan Smith, 38 F.3d 462, 94 Daily Journal DAR 14777, 40 Fed. R. Serv. 985, 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7982, 39 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 477, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 29146 (9th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

38 F.3d 462w

30 Fed.R.Serv.3d 477, 40 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 985

Maria E. ESPINOZA; Gilbert Espinoza; Mary Ellen Cale,
guardian ad litem, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Brian DUNN; Geody Okamoto; Patrick Martin; Dan Smith,
Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 91-56353, 91-56389 and 92-56018.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Dec. 7, 1993.

Decided Oct. 20, 1994.

NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION. SEE 38 f.3d 466.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI