Maria Bonilla, Relator v. Dakota Premium Foods and ACE USA/ESIS, Center for Diagnostic Imaging, Ingco International Inc, Injured Workers Pharmacy, Novacare Rehabilitation, Summit Orthopedics, and West Side Community Health Cervices, Intervenor.

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedDecember 2, 2015
DocketA15-233
StatusPublished

This text of Maria Bonilla, Relator v. Dakota Premium Foods and ACE USA/ESIS, Center for Diagnostic Imaging, Ingco International Inc, Injured Workers Pharmacy, Novacare Rehabilitation, Summit Orthopedics, and West Side Community Health Cervices, Intervenor. (Maria Bonilla, Relator v. Dakota Premium Foods and ACE USA/ESIS, Center for Diagnostic Imaging, Ingco International Inc, Injured Workers Pharmacy, Novacare Rehabilitation, Summit Orthopedics, and West Side Community Health Cervices, Intervenor.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maria Bonilla, Relator v. Dakota Premium Foods and ACE USA/ESIS, Center for Diagnostic Imaging, Ingco International Inc, Injured Workers Pharmacy, Novacare Rehabilitation, Summit Orthopedics, and West Side Community Health Cervices, Intervenor., (Mich. 2015).

Opinion

STATE OF MINNESOTA November 25, 2015

ORICEOF IN SUPREME COURT API!'B.I!AlECcuns

AIS-0233

Maria Bonilla,

Relator,

vs.

Dakota Premium Foods and ACE USAIESIS,

Respondents,

Center for Diagnostic Imaging, Ingco International, Inc., Injured Workers Pharmacy, Novacare Rehabilitation, Summit Orthopedics, and West Side Community Health Services,

Intervenors.

Vincent A. Petersen, Law Offices of Donald F. Noack, Mound, Minnesota, for relator.

Howard Y. Held, Lisa N. Truitt, Fitch, Johnson, Larson & Held, P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota, for respondents.

Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.

1 ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation

Court of Appeals filed and served on January 6, 2015, be, and the same is, affirmed

without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N. W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining

that "[s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the

court to any particular point of view," doing no more than establishing the law of the

case).

Dated: November 25, 2015 BY THE COURT:

'12L G. Barry Anderson Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hoff v. Kempton
317 N.W.2d 361 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Maria Bonilla, Relator v. Dakota Premium Foods and ACE USA/ESIS, Center for Diagnostic Imaging, Ingco International Inc, Injured Workers Pharmacy, Novacare Rehabilitation, Summit Orthopedics, and West Side Community Health Cervices, Intervenor., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maria-bonilla-relator-v-dakota-premium-foods-and-ace-usaesis-center-for-minn-2015.