Maria Antoineta Plasencia v. District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service

719 F.2d 1425, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 15493
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedNovember 7, 1983
Docket78-2641
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 719 F.2d 1425 (Maria Antoineta Plasencia v. District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maria Antoineta Plasencia v. District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service, 719 F.2d 1425, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 15493 (9th Cir. 1983).

Opinion

ORDER

This court has reviewed the briefs filed by the parties in the light of the Supreme Court’s holding that the respondent was entitled to due process as a permanent resident alien and the Supreme Court’s remand to determine whether due process was accorded under all the circumstances. See Landon v. Plasencia, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 321, 332, 74 L.Ed.2d 21 (1982). We conclude that the case should be remanded to the district court for further proceedings in accordance with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

F.L.B. v. Lynch
180 F. Supp. 3d 811 (W.D. Washington, 2016)
Barrett Bailey v. Department of Veterans Affairs
33 F.3d 58 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
719 F.2d 1425, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 15493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maria-antoineta-plasencia-v-district-director-immigration-and-ca9-1983.