Maria Antoineta Plasencia v. District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service

Ninth Circuit

Maria Antoineta Plasencia v. District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service

719 F.2d 1425, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 15493

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 7, 1983·No. 78-2641·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

This court has reviewed the briefs filed by the parties in the light of the Supreme Court’s holding that the respondent was entitled to due process as a permanent resident alien and the Supreme Court’s remand to determine whether due process was accorded under all the circumstances. See Landon v. Plasencia, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 321, 332, 74 L.Ed.2d 21 (1982). We conclude that the case should be remanded to the district court for further proceedings in accordance with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This court has reviewed the briefs filed by the parties in the light of the Supreme Court’s holding that the respondent was entitled to due process as a permanent resident alien and the Supreme Court’s remand to determine whether due process was accorded under all the circumstances. See Landon v. Plasencia, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 321, 332, 74 L.Ed.2d 21 (1982). We conclude that the case should be remanded to the district court for further proceedings in accordance with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

It is so ordered.

Maria Antoineta Plasencia v. District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service, 719 F.2d 1425, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 15493 (9th Cir. 1983).

Pincite

719 F.2d 1425 (Maria Antoineta Plasencia v. District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related