Margulies v. Federal Trade Commission

Third Circuit

Margulies v. Federal Trade Commission

339 F.2d 603

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedDecember 29, 1964

DocketNos. 14898, 14899

StatusPublished

This text of 339 F.2d 603 (Margulies v. Federal Trade Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Margulies v. Federal Trade Commission, 339 F.2d 603 (3d Cir. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In both of the above petitions to review orders to cease and desist issued by the Federal Trade Commission, the individual petitioner is the only party seeking review. In the No. 14898 administrative proceedings in addition to the present petitioner, Damar Products, Inc. and Product Testing Company, Inc. were also respondents. In No. 14899 Around-the-World Shoppers Club, a corporation trading as Trans-World Shoppers Club [604]*604and three other officers of said corporation in addition to the present petitioner, were respondents.

In both petitions petitioner contends that the cease and desist orders should not have issued against him in his individual capacity and that the orders are too broad in scope. Under the admitted facts we are satisfied that the inclusion of petitioner in both orders in his individual capacity is fully justified and that the scope of the orders is warranted by the facts of both cases. Proposed orders may be submitted by the Commission.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In both of the above petitions to review orders to cease and desist issued by the Federal Trade Commission, the individual petitioner is the only party seeking review. In the No. 14898 administrative proceedings in addition to the present petitioner, Damar Products, Inc. and Product Testing Company, Inc. were also respondents. In No. 14899 Around-the-World Shoppers Club, a corporation trading as Trans-World Shoppers Club [604]*604and three other officers of said corporation in addition to the present petitioner, were respondents.

In both petitions petitioner contends that the cease and desist orders should not have issued against him in his individual capacity and that the orders are too broad in scope. Under the admitted facts we are satisfied that the inclusion of petitioner in both orders in his individual capacity is fully justified and that the scope of the orders is warranted by the facts of both cases. Proposed orders may be submitted by the Commission.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

339 F.2d 603, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/margulies-v-federal-trade-commission-ca3-1964.