Margot Von Opel v. Fritz Von Opel
Opinion
Appellant sued in the District of Columbia to enforce a judgment obtained against appellee in New York. It is not enforcible here as a money judgment, because appellee was not a resi *667 dent of New York and was not personally served with process there. Stock certificates that had been vested by the Alien Property Custodian, and were in New York, are now in the District of Columbia. But vested property cannot be reached by attachment or execution. Von Opel v. Uebersee Finanz Korporation, 96 U.S.App.D.C. 230, 225 F.2d 530.
In declining to permit amendment of •appellant’s complaint, the District Court did not abuse its discretion.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
257 F.2d 666 (Margot Von Opel v. Fritz Von Opel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.