Margolis v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

57 A.D.3d 371, 870 N.Y.2d 252
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 18, 2008·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

In this personal injury action involving a vehicular accident in Nassau County, plaintiff properly placed venue in New York County based on the location in that county of the corporate defendant’s principal office (see CPLR 503 [c]). In seeking a [372] discretionary change of venue pursuant to CPLR 510 (3), defendants failed to show that material nonparty witnesses would be inconvenienced by testifying in New York County instead of Nassau (see Martinez v Dutchess Landaq, Inc., 301 AD2d 424 [2003]). There was no evidence presented that any witness would be inconvenienced by testifying in New York County. Furthermore, one witness cited by defendants was defendant Ciaccio, who is both a party and an employee of the corporate defendant, and another was an employee of the corporate defendant who was not a witness to the accident. Defendants did not identify the remaining police and medical witnesses, did not explain the materiality of their testimony, and did not set forth their willingness to testify or whether they had even been contacted. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.R, Gonzalez, Catterson, McGuire and Acosta, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Margolis v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 57 A.D.3d 371, 870 N.Y.2d 252 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

57 A.D.3d 371 (Margolis v. United Parcel Service, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Prechtl v. Trane U.S., Inc.
2023 NY Slip Op 00935 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Marte v. Lampert
2023 NY Slip Op 00375 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Parker v. Ferraro
61 A.D.3d 470 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)