Margolis v. Pinnas
124 A. 529, 99 N.J.L. 515, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 178
This text of 124 A. 529 (Margolis v. Pinnas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Margolis v. Pinnas, 124 A. 529, 99 N.J.L. 515, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 178 (N.J. 1924).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Minturn. Kalisoh, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Theodore the Florist Co. v. DA Schulte, Inc.
90 A.2d 898 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)
Rosenberg v. Reisman
153 A. 839 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1931)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
124 A. 529, 99 N.J.L. 515, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/margolis-v-pinnas-nj-1924.