Margolis v. City National Bank of Florida

493 So. 2d 1089, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1958, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9603
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 10, 1986·No. No. 85-2001·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant-landlord appeals from an order, in a non-jury trial, dismissing the case with prejudice and granting a final judgment in favor of appellee-tenant.

The facts aré not in dispute. The trial court correctly held that the only reasonable conclusion to be drawn from the evidence, taking all inferences in favor of the appellant, is that the landlord accepted surrender of the premises and occupied them for his own exclusive use and purposes. The extensive evidence in support of the order further satisfies the requirements of Kanter v. Safran, 68 So.2d 553 (Fla.1953) and Williams v. Aeroland Oil Co., 20 So.2d 346 (Fla.1944).

AFFIRMED.

LETTS, WALDEN and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Margolis v. City National Bank of Florida, 493 So. 2d 1089, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1958, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9603 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

493 So. 2d 1089 (Margolis v. City National Bank of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rolle v. State
493 So. 2d 1089 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)