Margolies v. Fitch
342 S.W.3d 443, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 806, 2011 WL 2331811
Opinion
ORDER
William Margolies (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s declaratory judgment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not err in denying Appellant relief on his petition. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Margolies v. Fitch, 342 S.W.3d 443, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 806, 2011 WL 2331811 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).
342 S.W.3d 443 (Margolies v. Fitch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Johnson
342 S.W.3d 443 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)