Margitich v. County of Orange

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Margitich v. County of Orange

85 A.D.2d 665, 449 N.Y.S.2d 642, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16489

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 21, 1981

StatusPublished

This text of 85 A.D.2d 665 (Margitich v. County of Orange) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Margitich v. County of Orange, 85 A.D.2d 665, 449 N.Y.S.2d 642, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16489 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to, inter alia, compel the reinstatement of the petitioner to his position as a stationary engineer, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (O’Gorman, J.), [666]*666dated October 1, 1980, which denied the County of Orange’s motion for an order vacating a stipulation of settlement entered into between the county and the petitioner. Leave to appeal is hereby granted by Justice Bracken. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Under the facts and circumstances of this case, Special Term did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to vacate the stipulation of settlement. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Titone, Weinstein and Bracken, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to, inter alia, compel the reinstatement of the petitioner to his position as a stationary engineer, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (O’Gorman, J.), [666]*666dated October 1, 1980, which denied the County of Orange’s motion for an order vacating a stipulation of settlement entered into between the county and the petitioner. Leave to appeal is hereby granted by Justice Bracken. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Under the facts and circumstances of this case, Special Term did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to vacate the stipulation of settlement. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Titone, Weinstein and Bracken, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

85 A.D.2d 665, 449 N.Y.S.2d 642, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/margitich-v-county-of-orange-nyappdiv-1981.