Margitan v. Hanna

Washington Supreme Court

Margitan v. Hanna

433 P.3d 808, 192 Wash. 2d 1018

Washington Supreme Court·Decided February 6, 2019·No. No. 96422-0·Published

Opinion

¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Johnson, Owens, Wiggins and Gordon McCloud, considered at its February 5, 2019, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 The Petitioners' motion to file a second amended petition for review is denied. The amended petition for review is denied. The Respondents' request for costs for answering the petition is also denied.

For the Court/s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Johnson, Owens, Wiggins and Gordon McCloud, considered at its February 5, 2019, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 The Petitioners' motion to file a second amended petition for review is denied. The amended petition for review is denied. The Respondents' request for costs for answering the petition is also denied.

For the Court/s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE

Margitan v. Hanna, 433 P.3d 808, 192 Wash. 2d 1018 (Wash. 2019).

Pincite

433 P.3d 808 (Margitan v. Hanna) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.