Margitan v. Hanna

Washington Supreme Court

Margitan v. Hanna

433 P.3d 808, 192 Wash. 2d 1018

CourtWashington Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 6, 2019

DocketNo. 96422-0

StatusPublished

This text of 433 P.3d 808 (Margitan v. Hanna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Margitan v. Hanna, 433 P.3d 808, 192 Wash. 2d 1018 (Wash. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Johnson, Owens, Wiggins and Gordon McCloud, considered at its February 5, 2019, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 The Petitioners' motion to file a second amended petition for review is denied. The amended petition for review is denied. The Respondents' request for costs for answering the petition is also denied.

For the Court/s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Johnson, Owens, Wiggins and Gordon McCloud, considered at its February 5, 2019, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 The Petitioners' motion to file a second amended petition for review is denied. The amended petition for review is denied. The Respondents' request for costs for answering the petition is also denied.

For the Court/s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

433 P.3d 808, 192 Wash. 2d 1018, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/margitan-v-hanna-wash-2019.