Margie L. Tapley v. Lockwood Green Engineers, Inc., Welding and Steel Fabrication Co., Inc., and Third Party v. George C. Seybolt, Third Party

Third Circuit

Margie L. Tapley v. Lockwood Green Engineers, Inc., Welding and Steel Fabrication Co., Inc., and Third Party v. George C. Seybolt, Third Party

502 F.2d 559, 19 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1264

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedSeptember 16, 1974

Docket74-1514

StatusPublished

Cited by12 cases

This text of 502 F.2d 559 (Margie L. Tapley v. Lockwood Green Engineers, Inc., Welding and Steel Fabrication Co., Inc., and Third Party v. George C. Seybolt, Third Party) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Margie L. Tapley v. Lockwood Green Engineers, Inc., Welding and Steel Fabrication Co., Inc., and Third Party v. George C. Seybolt, Third Party, 502 F.2d 559, 19 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1264 (3d Cir. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

*560 PER CURIAM.

This case comes before the court after referral from the screening panel, Local Rule 6, upon appellees’ motion for summary dismissal. Local Rule 9 (b).

The case revolves around a Missouri wrongful death action. The initial complaint sought damages of $50,000, the maximum amount then recoverable under Missouri law for wrongful death. After the filing of this complaint the wrongful death statute of Missouri was amended to allow for unlimited recovery. Plaintiff-appellants in turn filed an amended complaint seeking $500,000 in damages. Defendants moved to strike the prayer of the amended complaint on the ground that the amendment to the statute did not apply retroactively. The district court issued its order granting the motion and stating that plaintiffs might amend their complaint by reducing the ad damnum to $50,000. Plaintiffs appealed. The appealability of that order is now before the court.

If the order is to be deemed appealable under 28 U.S.C. 1291, it must fall within the “collateral order doctrine.” 1 Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 546-547, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949); Eisen v. Carlisle and Jacquelin, 417 U.S. 156, 94 S.Ct. 2140, 40 L.Ed.2d 732 (1974); Baxter v. United Forest Products Co., 406 F.2d 1120, 1123 (8th Cir. 1969). The order is not a final decision in the ordinary sense. Compare Delta Theatres v. Paramount Pictures, 259 F.2d 563 (5th Cir. 1958).

We do not view this appeal as one where substantial rights of any party will be irreparably lost if review is delayed. Cohen, supra at 546, 69 S.Ct. 1221. Indeed, the problem here may be obviated by a verdict for defendants or a plaintiffs’ verdict for less than $50,000. If and when the case is ultimately appealed from final judgment, the issue presented here can be more appropriately dealt with at that time.

Appeal dismissed.

1

. The appeal lias not been certified under 28 classes enumerated in 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a). U.S.C. § 1292 (b); nor does it fall within the

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*560 PER CURIAM.

This case comes before the court after referral from the screening panel, Local Rule 6, upon appellees’ motion for summary dismissal. Local Rule 9 (b).

The case revolves around a Missouri wrongful death action. The initial complaint sought damages of $50,000, the maximum amount then recoverable under Missouri law for wrongful death. After the filing of this complaint the wrongful death statute of Missouri was amended to allow for unlimited recovery. Plaintiff-appellants in turn filed an amended complaint seeking $500,000 in damages. Defendants moved to strike the prayer of the amended complaint on the ground that the amendment to the statute did not apply retroactively. The district court issued its order granting the motion and stating that plaintiffs might amend their complaint by reducing the ad damnum to $50,000. Plaintiffs appealed. The appealability of that order is now before the court.

If the order is to be deemed appealable under 28 U.S.C. 1291, it must fall within the “collateral order doctrine.” 1 Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 546-547, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949); Eisen v. Carlisle and Jacquelin, 417 U.S. 156, 94 S.Ct. 2140, 40 L.Ed.2d 732 (1974); Baxter v. United Forest Products Co., 406 F.2d 1120, 1123 (8th Cir. 1969). The order is not a final decision in the ordinary sense. Compare Delta Theatres v. Paramount Pictures, 259 F.2d 563 (5th Cir. 1958).

We do not view this appeal as one where substantial rights of any party will be irreparably lost if review is delayed. Cohen, supra at 546, 69 S.Ct. 1221. Indeed, the problem here may be obviated by a verdict for defendants or a plaintiffs’ verdict for less than $50,000. If and when the case is ultimately appealed from final judgment, the issue presented here can be more appropriately dealt with at that time.

Appeal dismissed.

1

. The appeal lias not been certified under 28 classes enumerated in 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a). U.S.C. § 1292 (b); nor does it fall within the

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

502 F.2d 559, 19 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/margie-l-tapley-v-lockwood-green-engineers-inc-welding-and-steel-ca3-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack