Margery Lane Corp. v. Underwriters At Lloyd's

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Margery Lane Corp. v. Underwriters At Lloyd's

293 So. 2d 785, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7684

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 2, 1974

DocketNo. 73-134

StatusPublished

This text of 293 So. 2d 785 (Margery Lane Corp. v. Underwriters At Lloyd's) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Margery Lane Corp. v. Underwriters At Lloyd's, 293 So. 2d 785, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7684 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, plaintiff below, appeals a summary final judgment entered for the defendants in an action where the plaintiff sought to charge its insurance agent with negligently failing to provide proper coverage. The essential facts are not in dispute. Nevertheless, appellant urges that there are inferences which may be drawn from the facts which would establish an issue of fact as to whether the agent was guilty of negligently failing to advise and counsel the plaintiff upon its insurance needs. A review of the record demonstrates that the trial court correctly determined that the admissions of the chief operating officer of the appellant corporation effectively established that there was no negligence on the part of the defendant agent. See Hettenbaugh v. Keyes-Ozon-Fincher Insurance, Inc., Fla.App.1962, 147 So.2d 328; Blum v. Sweet Insurance Agency, Inc., Fla.App. 1963, 157 So.2d 709.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, plaintiff below, appeals a summary final judgment entered for the defendants in an action where the plaintiff sought to charge its insurance agent with negligently failing to provide proper coverage. The essential facts are not in dispute. Nevertheless, appellant urges that there are inferences which may be drawn from the facts which would establish an issue of fact as to whether the agent was guilty of negligently failing to advise and counsel the plaintiff upon its insurance needs. A review of the record demonstrates that the trial court correctly determined that the admissions of the chief operating officer of the appellant corporation effectively established that there was no negligence on the part of the defendant agent. See Hettenbaugh v. Keyes-Ozon-Fincher Insurance, Inc., Fla.App.1962, 147 So.2d 328; Blum v. Sweet Insurance Agency, Inc., Fla.App. 1963, 157 So.2d 709.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

293 So. 2d 785, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7684, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/margery-lane-corp-v-underwriters-at-lloyds-fladistctapp-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack