Margart v. Swift
This text of 14 S.C.L. 378 (Margart v. Swift) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The court concur with the recorder in the View which he took of this case below.
The motion is therefore refused,
Gadsden, for the motion.
Rice, contra.
In Andrews vs. Dixon, 3. Barn and Ald. 645, it was decided that' where the Sheriff with the knowledge that there is rent due (o the landlord; proceeds to sell the tenant’s goods by virtue of a writ offi. fa. without retaining a years rent, he will be liable for it, although no specific notice haV •Theen given to him by the landlord. "
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 S.C.L. 378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/margart-v-swift-scctapp-1825.