Margaritell v. Township of Caldwell

165 A.2d 298, 33 N.J. 453, 1960 N.J. LEXIS 174
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 21, 1960·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Scherer in the Chancery Division reported at 58 N. J. Super. 251. The paragraph thereof (58 N. J. Super., at p. 261) suggesting a possible purpose for the repeal in 1953 of the statute here involved and intimating an effect of the enactment of the In Rem Tax Foreclosure Act of 1948 (N. J. S. A. 54:5-104.29, et seq.) on prior methods for the foreclosure of tax liens is not necessary to the decision and we express no view with respect thereto.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Francis, Proctor, Hall and Schettino — 5.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Margaritell v. Township of Caldwell, 165 A.2d 298, 33 N.J. 453, 1960 N.J. LEXIS 174 (N.J. 1960).

165 A.2d 298 (Margaritell v. Township of Caldwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
Rogan Equities, Inc. v. Santini
672 A.2d 1281 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1996)
State, Dept. of Envir. Protection v. Exxon Corp. and Ici America, Inc.
376 A.2d 1339 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1977)