Margarita Gaeta v. Perrigo Pharmaceuticals Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 27, 2012·No. 09-15001·Unpublished

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION FEB 27 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARGARITA GAETA, as guardian ad No. 09-15001 litem for A.G., a minor child and AUGUSTINE GAETA, D.C. No. 5:05-cv-04115-JW Northern District of California, Plaintiffs - Appellants, San Jose

v. ORDER PERRIGO PHARMACEUTICALS COMPANY and BASF CORPORATION,

Defendants - Appellees.

On Remand From The United States Supreme Court

Before: FERNANDEZ and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

The Supreme Court having vacated our prior opinion for further

consideration in light of PLIVA, Inc. v. Mensing, 131 S. Ct. 2567 (2011), see L.

Perrigo Co. v. Gaeta, 132 S. Ct. 497 (2011), we now AFFIRM the district court’s

grant of summary judgment in favor of Perrigo Pharmaceuticals Company.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Margarita Gaeta v. Perrigo Pharmaceuticals Co., (9th Cir. 2012).

Margarita Gaeta v. Perrigo Pharmaceuticals Co. (Margarita Gaeta v. Perrigo Pharmaceuticals Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

PLIVA, Inc. v. Mensing
180 L. Ed. 2d 580 (Supreme Court, 2011)
L. Perrigo Co. v. Gaeta
181 L. Ed. 2d 343 (Supreme Court, 2011)