Margarita Aceves v. Levi Strauss & Co.

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: January 5, 2012
• Docket: 13-11-00318-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-11-00318-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

MARGARITA ACEVES, ET AL., Appellants,

v.

LEVI STRAUSS & CO., ET AL., Appellees. ____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 93rd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justices Valdez and Justices Garza and Benavides Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, Margarita Aceves, et. al., filed an appeal from a judgment rendered

against her in favor of appellees, Levi Strauss & Co., et. al. On October 7, 2011, the

Clerk of this Court notified appellants that the clerk's record in the above cause was

originally due on August 16, 2011, and that the deputy district clerk, Aida Villarreal, had

notified this Court that appellants failed to make arrangements for payment of the clerk's record. The Clerk of this Court notified appellants of this defect so that steps could be

taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c).

Appellants were advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date

of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution.

Appellants have failed to respond to this Court=s notice. Accordingly, the appeal

is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). Any

pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 5th day of January, 2012.