MARGARET MARAMBIO, CARLOS R. SOTO OLGUIN, CARLOS AUGUSTIN SOTO AND MARGARET KATHERINE SOTO vs VIKRAM KHANDELWALVS
This text of MARGARET MARAMBIO, CARLOS R. SOTO OLGUIN, CARLOS AUGUSTIN SOTO AND MARGARET KATHERINE SOTO vs VIKRAM KHANDELWALVS (MARGARET MARAMBIO, CARLOS R. SOTO OLGUIN, CARLOS AUGUSTIN SOTO AND MARGARET KATHERINE SOTO vs VIKRAM KHANDELWALVS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
MARGARET MARAMBIO, CARLOS R. SOTO OLGUIN, CARLOS AUGUSTIN SOTO AND MARGARET KATHERINE SOTO, Appellants, Case No. 5D21-2456 v. LT Case No. 2021-CC-001240-O
VIKRAM KHANDELWALVS, Appellee. ________________________________/ Decision filed May 31, 2022
Nonfinal Appeal from the County Court for Orange County, Elizabeth Starr, Judge.
Debi V. Rumph, of The Law Offices of Debi V. Rumph, Orlando, for Appellants.
Charles Patrick Brady, of Charles Brady Law, PLLC, St. Petersburg, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
EVANDER and SASSO, JJ., concur. LAMBERT, C.J., dissents, without opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
MARGARET MARAMBIO, CARLOS R. SOTO OLGUIN, CARLOS AUGUSTIN SOTO AND MARGARET KATHERINE SOTO vs VIKRAM KHANDELWALVS, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/margaret-marambio-carlos-r-soto-olguin-carlos-augustin-soto-and-margaret-fladistctapp-2022.