Margaret Kinsella, Individually and D/B/A the Emerald Restaurant v. Kent Sports Holdings, L.P.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 15, 2021
Docket07-21-00012-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Margaret Kinsella, Individually and D/B/A the Emerald Restaurant v. Kent Sports Holdings, L.P. (Margaret Kinsella, Individually and D/B/A the Emerald Restaurant v. Kent Sports Holdings, L.P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Margaret Kinsella, Individually and D/B/A the Emerald Restaurant v. Kent Sports Holdings, L.P., (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo ________________________

No. 07-21-00012-CV ________________________

MARGARET KINSELLA, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A THE EMERALD RESTAURANT, APPELLANT

V.

KENT SPORTS HOLDINGS, L.P., APPELLEE

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 Travis County, Texas Trial Court No. C-1-CV-19-004937; Honorable Todd T. Wong, Presiding

April 15, 2021

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Before QUINN, C.J., and PIRTLE and DOSS, JJ.

Pending before this court is the parties’ Joint Motion to Continue the Briefing

Schedule, requesting that we extend the appellate briefing deadlines by ninety days to

allow the parties to continue settlement discussions. In the interest of conservation of

judicial resources, we abate the appeal, sua sponte, until July 12, 2021. All appellate

deadlines, including the pending deadline to file Appellant’s brief, are suspended. The case will be removed from our active docket and treated as a suspended case until July

12, 2021, when the case will be reinstated. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2, 43.6; Mesa Water, L.P.

v. Tex. Water Dev. Bd., No. 07-11-00153-CV, 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 5311, at *2-3 (Tex.

App.—Amarillo July 13, 2011, order) (per curiam).

If any development arises that might cause the court to reinstate the case prior to

the July 12, 2021 reinstatement date, the parties are directed to immediately advise the

court of the development. On reinstatement of the case, the court will entertain a motion

to further abate the appeal should it become necessary.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Margaret Kinsella, Individually and D/B/A the Emerald Restaurant v. Kent Sports Holdings, L.P., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/margaret-kinsella-individually-and-dba-the-emerald-restaurant-v-kent-texapp-2021.