Margaret Keita v. Steve Scarbrough

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Margaret Keita v. Steve Scarbrough

DecidedFebruary 5, 2015

DocketA15D0178

StatusPublished

This text of Margaret Keita v. Steve Scarbrough (Margaret Keita v. Steve Scarbrough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Margaret Keita v. Steve Scarbrough, (Ga. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ January 26, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15D0178. MARGARET KEITA v. STEVE SCARBROUGH.

Margaret Keita filed an application for discretionary appeal from a state court order issuing a writ of possession. We dismissed the application as untimely. Keita filed a motion for reconsideration from this ruling, demonstrating that she had obtained an extension of time in which to file the application. Keita’s motion for reconsideration is hereby GRANTED. Our previous order dismissing this application is VACATED and the application is REINSTATED. Upon review of the merits, however, the application is hereby DENIED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 01/26/2015 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ January 26, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15D0178. MARGARET KEITA v. STEVE SCARBROUGH.

Margaret Keita filed an application for discretionary appeal from a state court order issuing a writ of possession. We dismissed the application as untimely. Keita filed a motion for reconsideration from this ruling, demonstrating that she had obtained an extension of time in which to file the application. Keita’s motion for reconsideration is hereby GRANTED. Our previous order dismissing this application is VACATED and the application is REINSTATED. Upon review of the merits, however, the application is hereby DENIED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 01/26/2015 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Margaret Keita v. Steve Scarbrough, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/margaret-keita-v-steve-scarbrough-gactapp-2015.