Margaret G. Brooks v. Crowley Fleck

E.D. California

Margaret G. Brooks v. Crowley Fleck

DecidedMay 1, 2026

Docket2:25-cv-03694

StatusUnknown

This text of Margaret G. Brooks v. Crowley Fleck (Margaret G. Brooks v. Crowley Fleck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Margaret G. Brooks v. Crowley Fleck, (E.D. Cal. 2026).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARGARET G. BROOKS, Case No. 2:25-cv-03694-DC-JDP (PS) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 CROWLEY FLECK, et al., (ECF No. 6) 15 Defendants. 16 17 This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 18 § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 1, 2026, the magistrate judge filed findings and 19 recommendations herein which were served on the parties and contained notice that any 20 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No 21 objections were filed, and the time in which to do so has passed. 22 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 23 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 24 See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the 25 magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). 26 Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by 27 the record and by the proper analysis. 28 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: ] 1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed April 1, 2026, ECF No. 6, are 2 ADOPTED; 3 2. Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint, ECF No. 5, is DISMISSED without leave to 4 amend for failure to state a cognizable claim and as frivolous; and 5 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. : 3 | Dated: _ April 30, 2026 Rvs cs Dena Coggins 9 United States District Judge 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARGARET G. BROOKS, Case No. 2:25-cv-03694-DC-JDP (PS) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 CROWLEY FLECK, et al., (ECF No. 6) 15 Defendants. 16 17 This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 18 § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 1, 2026, the magistrate judge filed findings and 19 recommendations herein which were served on the parties and contained notice that any 20 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No 21 objections were filed, and the time in which to do so has passed. 22 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 23 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 24 See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the 25 magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). 26 Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by 27 the record and by the proper analysis. 28 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: ] 1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed April 1, 2026, ECF No. 6, are 2 ADOPTED; 3 2. Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint, ECF No. 5, is DISMISSED without leave to 4 amend for failure to state a cognizable claim and as frivolous; and 5 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. : 3 | Dated: _ April 30, 2026 Rvs cs Dena Coggins 9 United States District Judge 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Margaret G. Brooks v. Crowley Fleck, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/margaret-g-brooks-v-crowley-fleck-caed-2026.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack