Margaret Fleming, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Edward Fleming v. Mufid K. Ayoub

315 F.2d 47, 114 U.S. App. D.C. 301, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 6140
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided February 14, 1963·No. 17249·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment for defendant, appellee, entered upon a jury verdict in his favor after trial of a personal injury action for damages, filed by appellant. The injuries were alleged to have been caused by the negligence of appellee in driving an automobile which collided with appellant, a pedestrian, at a street intersection.

An instruction on last clear chance was not given in the form requested by appellant, but no objection was made to the instructions as given.

Upon consideration of the evidence in relation to the instructions in their en *48 tirety, together with the absence of objection to the instructions as given, we find no error which requires us to disturb the judgment entered upon the verdict of the jury.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Margaret Fleming, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Edward Fleming v. Mufid K. Ayoub, 315 F.2d 47, 114 U.S. App. D.C. 301, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 6140 (D.C. Cir. 1963).

315 F.2d 47 (Margaret Fleming, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Edward Fleming v. Mufid K. Ayoub) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mains v. United States
372 F. Supp. 1093 (S.D. Ohio, 1974)