Margaret Fallon Palmer v. Harriet R. Searle, Margaret Fallon Palmer v. William D. Searle

226 F.2d 781, 96 U.S. App. D.C. 417, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 3117
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedNovember 3, 1955
Docket12658
StatusPublished

This text of 226 F.2d 781 (Margaret Fallon Palmer v. Harriet R. Searle, Margaret Fallon Palmer v. William D. Searle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Margaret Fallon Palmer v. Harriet R. Searle, Margaret Fallon Palmer v. William D. Searle, 226 F.2d 781, 96 U.S. App. D.C. 417, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 3117 (D.C. Cir. 1955).

Opinion

226 F.2d 781

Margaret Fallon PALMER, Appellant,
v.
Harriet R. SEARLE, Appellee.
Margaret Fallon PALMER, Appellant,
v.
William D. SEARLE, Appellee.

No. 12657.

No. 12658.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued October 18, 1955.

Decided November 3, 1955.

Mr. Joseph E. Casey, Washington, D. C., for appellant.

Mr. Dale D. Drain, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. B. Woodruff Weaver, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellees.

Before PRETTYMAN, WILBUR K. MILLER and BASTIAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was plaintiff in two civil actions for damages, one against the driver and the other against the owner of an automobile which was in collision with plaintiff's car. The trial court, hearing the case without a jury, made findings of fact and conclusions of law favorable to the defendants, for whom judgment was thereupon entered.

We are not at liberty to set aside findings of fact of the trial court unless they are clearly erroneous1; and since, in our opinion, the findings in this case are not clearly erroneous, the judgment must be and is

Affirmed.

Notes:

1

Rule 52(a) F.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S.C.A

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
226 F.2d 781, 96 U.S. App. D.C. 417, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 3117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/margaret-fallon-palmer-v-harriet-r-searle-margaret-fallon-palmer-v-cadc-1955.