Home/Fifth Circuit/Margaret Christmas Lafargue and Alexander Lafargue v. Dr. Ernest C. Samuel

Margaret Christmas Lafargue and Alexander Lafargue v. Dr. Ernest C. Samuel

367 F.2d 396
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedNovember 28, 1966
Docket23034
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 367 F.2d 396 (Margaret Christmas Lafargue and Alexander Lafargue v. Dr. Ernest C. Samuel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Margaret Christmas Lafargue and Alexander Lafargue v. Dr. Ernest C. Samuel, 367 F.2d 396 (5th Cir. 1966).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal, where jurisdiction depends upon diversity of citizenship, the controlling principle is announced in Succession of Roux v. Guidry, decided by the Court of Appeal of Louisiana and reported in 182 So.2d 109. The rule there announced requires that the judgment of the district court be, and it is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lillie Bell Gaston v. B. F. Walker, Inc.
400 F.2d 671 (Fifth Circuit, 1968)
Francis v. Herrin Transportation Co.
423 S.W.2d 610 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1968)
Alejandro Barrio-Mendoza v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
367 F.2d 396 (Fifth Circuit, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
367 F.2d 396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/margaret-christmas-lafargue-and-alexander-lafargue-v-dr-ernest-c-samuel-ca5-1966.