Margaret Christmas Lafargue and Alexander Lafargue v. Dr. Ernest C. Samuel
367 F.2d 396
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 28, 1966·No. 23034·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
In this appeal, where jurisdiction depends upon diversity of citizenship, the controlling principle is announced in Succession of Roux v. Guidry, decided by the Court of Appeal of Louisiana and reported in 182 So.2d 109. The rule there announced requires that the judgment of the district court be, and it is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Margaret Christmas Lafargue and Alexander Lafargue v. Dr. Ernest C. Samuel, 367 F.2d 396 (5th Cir. 1966).
367 F.2d 396 (Margaret Christmas Lafargue and Alexander Lafargue v. Dr. Ernest C. Samuel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lillie Bell Gaston v. B. F. Walker, Inc.
400 F.2d 671 (Fifth Circuit, 1968)
Francis v. Herrin Transportation Co.
423 S.W.2d 610 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1968)
Alejandro Barrio-Mendoza v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
367 F.2d 396 (Fifth Circuit, 1966)